Who to trust?

Moderator Posts : 6 Join date : 2008-01-26

I thought we needed one of these. Basically, just assemble a list of people you think could pass movesets here without needing approval. Basically the people who know what they are doing:
-Konrad
-Raylax

Posts : 48 Join date : 2008-01-26 Age : 31

I think most people, no matter how much they are trusted should submit their work to a questioning thread to iron out any flaws it might have that one person might not see.

Moderator Posts : 7 Join date : 2008-01-26

Maxz wrote:: I think most people, no matter how much they are trusted should submit their work to a questioning thread to iron out any flaws it might have that one person might not see.

I'd agree with this. Not only does it stop trusted members from making mistakes that no-one picks up on, but it stops double standards from popping up.

Posts : 1 Join date : 2008-01-26

Deepblade wrote:

Maxz wrote:: I think most people, no matter how much they are trusted should submit their work to a questioning thread to iron out any flaws it might have that one person might not see.

I'd agree with this. Not only does it stop trusted members from making mistakes that no-one picks up on, but it stops double standards from popping up.

Of course, I'd third this. =D

Posts : 48 Join date : 2008-01-26 Age : 31

Student of Madness wrote:

Deepblade wrote:

Maxz wrote:: I think most people, no matter how much they are trusted should submit their work to a questioning thread to iron out any flaws it might have that one person might not see.

I'd agree with this. Not only does it stop trusted members from making mistakes that no-one picks up on, but it stops double standards from popping up.

Of course, I'd third this. =D

Having said that, I'm happy for a few members to deal with minor corrections like grammar and misspellings. These members could also help in editing more major things if the general public all agree on it. At the moment, all the pressure is on poor old Konny and Raylax to do all the editing, no matter how minor.

In a nutshell, more Mods are fine, as long as bigger changes are discussed with the rest of the community.

Moderator Posts : 16 Join date : 2008-01-26

Maxz wrote:: Having said that, I'm happy for a few members to deal with minor corrections like grammar and misspellings.

That's uh, my job.

Moderator Posts : 45 Join date : 2008-01-26

If we have a sperate thread for each Pokemon and all suggested movesets are put in the first post to be commented on, then that'll deal with a large amount of our Quality Control issues. If a sets been suggested without criticism and looks alright after a couple of days, maybe put it in the D/P analysis? If any obvious flaws do arise about it in the thread, they can easily be changed on the analysis page.

I don't think a 'trusted member' system would work as all of us make mistakes or miss out good ideas. It may also put off other members from suggesting stuff if they have to go through a critical analysis just because they're not on 'the list'.

Posts : 48 Join date : 2008-01-26 Age : 31

GrooveMan.exe wrote:

Maxz wrote:: Having said that, I'm happy for a few members to deal with minor corrections like grammar and misspellings.

That's uh, my job.

I saw that you and DB were 'Modified' right after I wrote that and felt a bit foolish... Razz

I'm sorry for already doing this (I read Konnie's post about starting afresh after I'd done it) but are we allowed to resubmit threads from the old thread for another check to see if we can re-use them here if here if they're any good?

Admin Posts : 90 Join date : 2008-01-05

Maxz wrote:

GrooveMan.exe wrote:

Maxz wrote:: Having said that, I'm happy for a few members to deal with minor corrections like grammar and misspellings.

That's uh, my job.

I saw that you and DB were 'Modified' right after I wrote that and felt a bit foolish... Razz

I'm sorry for already doing this (I read Konnie's post about starting afresh after I'd done it) but are we allowed to resubmit threads from the old thread for another check to see if we can re-use them here if here if they're any good?

Yeah. Unless you know them to be utter crap.

Posts : 48 Join date : 2008-01-26 Age : 31

Raylax wrote:

Maxz wrote:

GrooveMan.exe wrote:

Maxz wrote:: Having said that, I'm happy for a few members to deal with minor corrections like grammar and misspellings.

That's uh, my job.

I saw that you and DB were 'Modified' right after I wrote that and felt a bit foolish... Razz

I'm sorry for already doing this (I read Konnie's post about starting afresh after I'd done it) but are we allowed to resubmit threads from the old thread for another check to see if we can re-use them here if here if they're any good?

Yeah. Unless you know them to be utter crap.

Awesome. We had some novel ideas and it'd be a pity to loose them.